genres artists forums info

« Worldwide music licensing breakdown | Main | Magnatune signs digital distribution deal with CDBABY »

Music Week Blasts CC and Magnatune

Music Week, a music-industry magazine based in the UK, ran a very negative story today about the Creative Commons. Magnatune is briefly referred to in it:

It is feared by some in the music business that some musicians and songwriters will unwittingly turn to CC when it is launched here: a web-based record label, Magnatune, has already been set up based on CC principles and David Byrne and The Beastie Boys have already been featured on a CC compilation album.

It seems that this article is in response to a seminar at MIDEM, a music industry trade show in Cannes, France that Magnatune exhibited at last year (we didn't exhibit there this year). The article seems to confuse a Creative Commons license with "public domain", which are very different things, but is interesting to read as a knee-jerk reaction.

Needless to say, I received a very different reaction during a panel discussion I participated in today at Stanford University, with Lessig, two lawyers and the CC's Glenn Otis Brown. http://www.stanford.edu/group/SESLA/

Below is the complete article text:

CC creates industry concern The Music business is casting a wary eye over over the imminent arrival in the UK of a new license scheme for creators.

The Creative Commons (CC) license, which has roots in the US philanthropic and academic community, is designed to enable artists, film makers, writers,programmers and others gain maximum exposure for their work without users having to obtain the time-consuming permissions that normal copyright requires.

CC, which was the subject of a seminar at Midem, eminates from the US's prestigious Stanford Law School, which issued it first licenses in the US in 2002; a draft license has been drawn up by the University of Oxford's media and law department ready for it to be launched in the UK.

It is feared by some in the music business that some musicians and songwriters will unwittingly turn to CC when it is launched here: a web-based record label, Magnatune, has already been set up based on CC principles and David Byrne and The Beastie Boys have already been featured on a CC compilation album.

MPA chief executive Sarah Faulder voices concern that young acts could 'give up everything for no money and irrevocably' in their keenness to be heard. Patrick Rackow, barrister at Steeles Law, believes that the CC license is totally unnecessary . 'This is not an alternative to copyright,' he says. 'If people want to give their work away they have always been able to do that.'

Once a work has been passed into CC it an never be retrieved, which Faulder and others believe would be disastrous if a new group signed its first single away to the public domain with a CC license and then discovered it had the potential to become a worldwide hit.

British Academy of Composers and Songwriters chairman David Ferguson says that the CC model may work in the US, but European copyright law operates for the creators as much as big business.

'In certain areas like academia I think it is fine,but not in music or the audio visual world,' he says.

Posted by John Buckman on February 16, 2005 at 10:56 PM | Permalink

Comments

It seems no one there actually read a CC license!

This line is the shining example: "MPA chief executive Sarah Faulder voices concern that young acts could 'give up everything for no money and irrevocably' in their keenness to be heard.".

Wait a minute - isn't that what they do when they sign a deal with a record label?

Posted by: Keith Crusher at Feb 17, 2005 8:02:16 AM

I think magnatune is great, and I only hope that other record labels adopt a similar strategy.

The big music industry boys are terrified of the fairly direct way in which tunes can be sold online, with artists getting a large share of the royalties. It means that all the music biz middle men and hangers-on become obsolete.

Posted by: Bob Mottram at Feb 17, 2005 12:14:06 PM

What a disgustingly uninformed article! And plenty of FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt). (Is it designed to generate FUD, or is it simply an expression of their own FUD?)

>"which has roots in the US..."

Make it feel like a foreign invasion.

>"give up everything for no money and irrevocably"

Ignore the tru nature of CC licences.

>"If people want to give their work away they have always been able to do that."

Yes, but not in an easy and consistent way that reduces burden on creator and consumer.

The reference to Magnatune et al is unfairly linked to the "feared by some" sentence by a colon, as if to say, "Look! This new evil is already gaining ground! Obviously they chose CC unwittingly."

>"...the CC model may work in the US, but European copyright law operates for the creators as much as big business."

Two unrelated clauses in that sentence. It doesn't explain why CC is not appropriate in Europe. It also ignores the fact that US copyright law is also designed to help creators, even if European companies have not yet caught up to US companies in taking advantage of copyright for their own benefit.

The article neglects to mention that (or the author is unaware that):
- Licensing with CC is not placing work in the public domain.
- Many artists are not sitting on the verge of releasing a major hit. A good band could create interest with easy-to-distribute songs, then apply full copyright restrictions to their next "worldwide hit" if they have success.

Oh, to be able to beat some sense into the author(s) and MPA chief...

Posted by: Nathan Jones at Feb 17, 2005 4:14:45 PM

Hi John,

There's an interesting article on AlwaysOn about copyright and music that is related to your post, it is called :

"Whistling in the Dark : The Internet and Napster have shaken up the music industry, and its old business model is dysfunctional and broken. More changes are coming."

02.17.05 @00:41
"Martin Pichinson, a former music manager who now restructures and liquidates companies (including many Silicon Valley startups), asks entertainment attorney Ken Hertz, music industry journalist Bob Lefsetz, and president of the Recording Academy Neil Portnow for an overview of the state of copyright in the music industry at a Churchill Club session called Copyright vs. Right to Copy: Intellectual Property and Artists' Rights in the World of Technology."

http://www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=7953_0_1_0_C

Thought it might be interesting to read.

Keep up the excellent work done with MagnaTune!!!

Posted by: Nicolás Amado at Feb 18, 2005 3:51:24 AM